Insurance Claims & Adjuster Disputes
Wear and tear is excluded from every policy. Carriers apply it to wind damage by pointing at the roof’s age rather than the damage pattern.
Written by Nathaniel Davis, owner of Roof Gutter Now — a licensed exterior restoration contractor in Ohio, Pennsylvania and New York. Updated August 2026
Every policy excludes wear and tear, and every adjuster knows it. On an older roof it becomes the default explanation for damage that a storm actually caused.
Wear and tear is uniform and progressive: even granule loss, curling across whole slopes, brittleness everywhere. It does not respect wind direction.
Wind damage is directional and discrete. Lifted or creased tabs concentrate on the elevations facing the storm and along the rakes, where uplift pressure is highest. Sealant strips release cleanly rather than degrading gradually.

Map damage by elevation and count it. A storm pattern shows a clear directional bias; wear does not. Pull the NOAA record for the date of loss and note the recorded gust at the nearest station. Photograph the sealant strip on lifted tabs — a clean release reads very differently from a strip that has crumbled with age.
Then corroborate with soft metals. Dented gutter aprons and bent vent caps on the same elevations establish that a wind and hail event occurred, whatever the age of the shingles.
Yes. Age drives depreciation, not causation. The question is what caused the damage, and it is answered separately.
Common, and the carrier owes for the storm portion. Documenting the directional pattern is what carves it out.
It establishes that a qualifying event occurred on the date of loss, which removes one line of argument entirely.
See Insurance Claims services or find your local crew.
Free inspection, photographs of every finding, and a written scope before any work starts.
Call (330) 918-1018